UK government takes legal action over Johnson’s Covid messages

Rishi Sunak’s authorities on Thursday launched authorized motion to dam the discharge of Boris Johnson’s unredacted WhatsApp messages to the official Covid-19 public inquiry.

However in a brand new twist, it emerged that Johnson had solely given the federal government messages referring to the interval after Could 2021 when he acquired a brand new telephone; by that point the worst of the Covid disaster had handed.

The 2 developments prompted Labour to say that each Sunak and Johnson have been making an attempt to frustrate the inquiry, arrange to attract classes from the best way the federal government dealt with the pandemic.

The choice to hunt a judicial evaluation to dam the discharge of “unambiguously irrelevant” unredacted messages places Sunak at loggerheads with the top of the inquiry, former decide Baroness Heather Hallett.

The Cupboard Workplace stated it had taken the authorized step “with remorse” and to attempt to shield “the rights of people and the right conduct of presidency”.

It revealed that Johnson had solely given it communications relationship from Could 2021 — greater than a 12 months after the pandemic hit Britain and the identical month he introduced the Covid inquiry.

Johnson’s allies stated he acquired a brand new telephone that month after a safety breach and was advised by safety officers by no means to activate the outdated system. “The impact is that historic messages are not out there to go looking and the telephone shouldn’t be energetic,” one ally stated.

Johnson, who nonetheless has the outdated telephone, has written to the Cupboard Workplace to see if messages may very well be retrieved “with out compromising safety”. Johnson’s allies stated that they had “no concept” if this may be potential.

Johnson additionally wrote to Hallett on Thursday to say he was “very happy at hand over the related WhatsApps and notebooks that you’ve got requested in unredacted kind” and that he was keen to ship them to her straight.

Hallett had given the federal government till 4pm on Thursday at hand over unredacted materials referring to Johnson’s time as prime minister, together with WhatsApp messages and notebooks.

However at 4.20pm the Cupboard Workplace introduced it might search go away to deliver a judicial evaluation, arguing that Hallett was exceeding her statutory powers in demanding the total cache of unedited materials.

There may be an consciousness in Whitehall that the choice concerning whether or not or to not submit Johnson’s communications unredacted will set a precedent for what different ministers — together with Sunak himself — may need at hand over to Hallett’s staff at a later date.

Sunak was chancellor in the course of the pandemic and was sceptical about lockdowns, warning concerning the financial harm they might trigger.

“The request for unambiguously irrelevant materials goes past the powers of the inquiry,” the Cupboard Workplace stated. Hallett has argued that she ought to resolve whether or not or not materials is irrelevant.

Labour stated that each Sunak and Johnson have been “taking part in video games on the public’s expense”, whereas Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy chief, accused Sunak of participating in a “determined try to withhold proof”.

“After 13 years of Tory scandal, these newest smoke and mirror ways serve solely to undermine the Covid inquiry. The general public deserve solutions, not one other cover-up,” she stated. 

Talking earlier at a summit in Moldova, Sunak insisted the federal government was “assured in our place”. He careworn the significance of studying classes from the pandemic and approaching the inquiry “within the spirit of rigour but in addition transparency and candour”.

The federal government has handed over greater than 55,000 paperwork and “will proceed to conform, in fact, with the regulation” and “co-operate with the inquiry”, Sunak stated.

Officers have accused the inquiry of taking an “absolutist” method to the disclosure of fabric, however insisted the wrangling over the matter was not confrontational.

Back To Top